Q:If you can not, in good conscience, vote for either the Republican or Democratic nominees, is a write-in vote, even if it is for someone not on the ballot, a total waste?
I mean, obviously, if it’s not going to be counted, then in one sense, it’s a wasted vote. But why should I (or anyone else) be required to vote for a candidate that we do not feel is qualified, or do not feel will be a good leader?
I know I am an idealist. I know I am. But I have always had this independent streak to me. When I feel, on a level of conscience, that i am right, even if I am the only one in the room who feels that way, I cannot (okay, I have, but I always regret it) make a statement in the affirmative towards that which I do not believe.
I have paid more attention to this election than any before. I have watched more cable TV than I care to admit. I watched as much of the debates as I could. And this morning, when I woke up, I still did not feel that either of the two candidates was someone that I could fully endorse. Yes, I thought that I more closely aligned with one than I did the other. But each of them had their sticking points in my mind.
Even when I walked up to the voting booth, I wasn’t sure what I was going to do. Was I going to abstain? Was I going to compromise and vote for the candidate that I felt I most closely aligned with, even though I had serious doubts about their ability to lead the country? Was I going toblindly select one of the anonymous third-party candidates, just to prove my point?
Then, in a moment of inspiration, I remembered the face & name of a candidate who had been eliminated in the primaries. Someone I really felt would have been a good President. He wasn’t on the ballot.
I know (Because I got an e-mail) that writing in someone who is not on the ballot meant that the vote would not be counted. But my conscience aligned with him. On a smaller scale, I felt like a martyr who, with his last breath, chooses to remain silent and die rather than say something that violated his conscience. Okay, I know it’s not that stoic or heroic or anything-else-oic, but IT FELT THAT WAY (sort of, on a smaller scale).
So I wrote in the candidate that I would have voted for. And (admission) should have voted for in the primaries).
I have caught a lot of flak for this. A vote for (the candidate I wrote in) is PRETTY MUCH A VOTE AGAINST (the nominee of that party).
And, on a practical level, that may be true. I may have hurt the party that I most closely align. But to me, on a completely idealistic level, it felt like the right thing to do.
Am I lazy? passive aggressive? am i just making it easier on myself when the elected president screws up, so I can say “I TOLD YOU! MAN I AM GLAD I DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM”?
Maybe? I don’t feel that way, though. I am legitimately disappointed that i am not behind one of these candidates. I wish that I had an eligible candidate that I could be excited about, and give an official endorsement. Hopefully that day will come. But this year, I just don’t.
And, while we’re looking at the big-picture ramifications of my choice, let’s be honest: the electoral college isn’t going to come down to one vote. Neither McCain nor Obama will truly suffer at the hands of my write in vote. There are more people voting this election than ever before.
And with that in mind, I think I did the right thing. I have considered how I would feel if I had voted for either candidate. One, then the other. I would feel like I had compromised, either way. (obviously moreso on one side than the other, but still.) And with the vote that I made, I feel … good. Even to know that it went to waste. I would rather feel like my conscience was clean.
Am I contributing to a victory for the side I support less?
Am I being a counterproductive American?
I don’t think I am. Though I can certainly see that argument.